Taking A Position On Brutality
#TITLE#Fighting Is Not The Solution: How We Can Promote Concord#/TITLE# by Bea K. Currier The great question now, with the advancements of humanity, is: why is maliciousness still a concern? When I consider violence between people I imagine a primitive club fight. Given that we have some things the cavemen didn’t, like tools and skills to sustain ourselves, then it just doesn’t make sense to me as to why people are violent toward one another. While we like to imagine our society as being enlightened, as we have a profusion of means, but we still fall back on the unenlightened strategies of our forerunners. So how come individuals are occasionally brutish? I feel that aggression, on a rudimentary plane, comes from anxiety and a disengagement from civilization. What else would cause one person to objectify another to the point of causing physical harm? It’s when one person has lost a sense for who they are that they can look at another person and see an object, rather than a living, breathing person. Luckily, plenty of folks and groups are toiling to free humanity from brutality. Gandhi is just one example of a person who has taken a stance against aggression over time. I believe that now more than ever, there are an increased number of associations committed to making brutality a thing of the past. A modern example of someone who has devoted much time to decreasing violence in the world is Sara Bronfman, through the World Ethical Foundations Consortium and the Ethical Humanitarian Foundation Executive Success Program by NXIVM. By focusing on moral values, she comprehends that there may be more lasting resolutions to the dilemma of aggression. There are a great number of groups that have endeavored to diminish hostility across the globe, but they have fallen short – and why? Spreading a moral code from human to fellow human is required, I feel. A lot of associations give assistance like a band-aid, remedying only the symptoms and not the cause, leaving the source of the problem unaddressed. What might transpire if we were each to base ourselves in an unyielding mindset of morality? A particular state of affairs would have a direct change on another, and moms and dads would be able to imbue their sons and daughters with those ethics. It’s my opinion that with some work, in the future, aggression can be eliminated. It’s my opinion that a populace rooted in a sound moral code has that promise Nxivm. People could deal with hostility in a constructive manner, and would help prevent it from rematerializing. One by one, we can each have a positive impact on our society and the society of our kids.